Reuters Columnist James Saft says rather than focusing on monetary and fiscal policies, it is in the best interest of the economy to reform executive compensation structures and levels.
Columnist -- -- are investing in our answer. Yeah see. Disappointing -- Which -- Corporate investment and high and rising or. How do you explain this. The one point 75 trillion cash -- -- what you are. Allied partners. Some believe it's too much regulation. Too much uncertainty about the future. And something the answer is more government spending and ordered it started in order to meet new. Usually there's an economist in -- hasn't yet. He thinks the way corporations decide how to invest the future changed fundamentally. It's being driven by our executive. Executives are paid mostly in shares. And what are they get this year is tied to short term measures are -- It's really hard for an executive to make a decision to pull the trigger on tenured. When it won't help him get his -- any man in -- -- re. Isn't necessarily good for sure -- czar who often among themselves holding company's -- -- future at least. And it's certainly not good for the economy because we are simply not -- seem to -- -- -- and asks. It made me more government spending won't recede seemed kind of magnifying power Robert -- And it could be more and more about monetary problems were eating fish. Would be an Internet. Best interests and an economy. It would instead concentrate on --